Patrick Agte

I am a postdoctoral research associate at the Yale Economic Growth Center. I received my PhD in economics from Princeton University in 2023. I am a development economist and my research uses tools from applied microeconomics and empirical industrial organization to study health and education markets in India and Latin America.

You can find my CV here.

I am on the 2024/25 academic job market.


Contact Information

patrick.agte@yale.edu

Job Market Paper 

Fighting Silent Killers: The Equilibrium Effects of India's Primary Healthcare Expansion (joint with Jitendra Kumar Soni). Draft coming soon.


Millions of adults in low- and middle-income countries die due to treatable conditions every year. This paper highlights that an under-staffed low-quality public healthcare system contributes to high premature mortality rates,  both directly and indirectly by enabling low-quality private sector providers to survive. Our evidence comes from an evaluation of a large-scale program in rural India that added a trained healthcare worker to public village clinics that were previously only staffed by a midwife. Exploiting quasi-experimental variation caused by program rules, we find that the arrival of a new healthcare worker increased patient loads at public village clinics by 58%  and reduced all-age mortality in the catchment area by 10% within two years. Eighty percent of the mortality decline is attributable to a decrease in deaths of adults aged 56+ years, leading to an increase in their life expectancy by at least three months. Novel survey evidence shows that the reform improved performance and service availability in the public sector and also induced private providers to increase their quality.  Using a structural model of patient demand,  we estimate that 10% percent of the decrease in mortality can be attributed to private sector responses. We further find that, if the government had taken local market conditions into account when assigning the new healthcare workers to public facilities, it could have achieved an 18% greater reduction in mortality outcomes. We estimate that the reform is highly cost-effective even in its current form, suggesting relatively low-cost state interventions can address market failures that contribute to high premature mortality.


Publications

Investing in the Next Generation: The Long-Run Impacts of a Liquidity Shock (joint with Arielle Bernhardt, Erica Field, Rohini Pande, and Natalia Rigol). American Economic Review, Sep 2024, Vol 114 (9): 2792-2824. Slides VoxDev Article 


Poor entrepreneurs must frequently choose between business investment and children's education. To examine this trade-off, we exploit experimental variation in short-run microenterprise growth among a sample of Indian households and track schooling and business outcomes over eleven years. Treated households, who experience higher initial microenterprise growth, are on average one-third more likely to send children to college. However, educational investment and schooling gains are concentrated among literate-parent households, whose enterprises eventually stagnate. In contrast, illiterate-parent households experience long-run business gains but declines in children's education. Our findings suggest that microenterprise growth has the potential to reduce relative intergenerational educational mobility.

Working Papers

Search and Biased Beliefs in Education Markets (joint with Claudia Allende, Adam Kapor, Christopher Neilson, and Fernando Ochoa). Submitted.


When learning about schools requires costly search, search decisions depend on families' beliefs about the returns. This paper asks how families' (limited) awareness of schools and (inaccurate) beliefs about schools' prices, quality ratings, and placement chances distort their search efforts and application decisions in the context of Chile's nationwide centralized school choice process. We combine novel data on search activity with a panel of household surveys, administrative application data, randomized information experiments, and a model of demand for schools. We find that households are unaware of many relevant schools, and hold inaccurate beliefs about admissions chances, prices, and quality scores, affecting their search decisions and application decisions. Most importantly, households' perceptions systematically overstate the quality ratings of schools that they know and like. Correcting misperceptions about known schools causes students to match to schools with higher quality, equal to what can be achieved under a full-information benchmark, and closes the quality gap between low-SES and high-SES applicants.


The Economics of Purity Norms: Caste, Social Interaction, and Women's Work in India (joint with Arielle Bernhardt). Slides


Caste norms, the religious and social rules that underpin the Hindu caste system, impose strong constraints on behavior: women should stay secluded within the home, caste groups should stay segregated, and certain foods should not be eaten. This paper shows that caste norms are weakened when Hindus live alongside Adivasis, an indigenous minority outside of the caste system. Using a number of estimation strategies, including a historical natural experiment that led to local variation in Adivasi population share, we show that having more Adivasi neighbors decreases Hindus' adherence to a wide range of caste rules. Hindu women in Adivasi-majority villages are 50% more likely to work and have substantially higher earnings. Individuals higher on the caste hierarchy are less likely to practice "untouchability" towards those lower than them and villages are more likely to be integrated. We argue that Hindus adhere to caste norms as an investment in status within the caste system, and that this investment is less valuable when Adivasis - a lower-status out-group - form a larger share of the village population. Consistent with this explanation, caste norms are weaker in areas where British colonial policy led Adivasis to hold more land and political power, increasing the returns to social and economic interactions with Adivasis independent of their population share.


The Making of a Public Sector Worker: The Causal Effects of Temporary Work Assignments to Poor Areas (joint with Mariel Bedoya). 


Can temporary work assignments to poor areas affect worker preferences, beliefs, and career choices? We provide evidence on this question using random variation in the assignment of psychologists within a one-year mandatory rural service program in Peru. Psychologists who completed the program in poorer places are later 17% more likely to work for the public sector and 59% more likely to work in the poorest districts in the country. We provide survey evidence that points to increased prosociality as an important mechanism. Additional findings suggest that the results are not driven by inertia or differences in hireability.

Work in Progress

Optimal Teacher Allocations When Identity Matters: Evidence from a Large-Scale Teacher Lottery in India (joint with Arielle Bernhardt, S.K. Ritadhi, and Rohit Joseph).


Heterogeneity in Hospital Value Added and Delivery Choices: Evidence from 1.5 Million Births in India (joint with Sagar Saxena).


Research Information and the Last-Mile: Evidence from a Scale-Up Experiment with Secondary Schools in the Dominican Republic (joint with Daniel Morales, Christopher Neilson, and Sebastian Otero). 

Additional Work

Lessons from the Covid Care Centers in West Bengal (joint with Abhijit Chowdhury, Jishnu Das, Parthasarathi Mukherjee, and Satyarup Siddhanta). Center for Policy Research Working Paper.


Gender Gaps and Economic Growth: Why Haven’t Women Won Globally (Yet)? (joint with Orazio Attanasio, Pinelopi Goldberg, Aishwarya Lakshmi Ratan, Rohini Pande, Michael Peters, Charity Troyer Moore, and Fabrizio Zilibotti). EGC Discussion Paper.